April172014
johnnysjetpack:

angryaccounting:

source
How to use their own tactics against them

i’ll have to remember this lol

johnnysjetpack:

angryaccounting:

source

How to use their own tactics against them

i’ll have to remember this lol

(via antifeminist-egalitarian)

6PM

imminentdeathsyndrome:

this-is-cthulhu-privilege:

archmasterjazzy:

realjusticewesteros:

grapingfeminists:

Source»

If you want to talk about “rape culture”, then the issue of false rape accusations must be addressed. It trivializes the real cases and makes everyone all the more skeptical and non sympathetic towards real victims.

-SS

Friendly reminder: this is still happening. White women accuse black men of raping them, and the law and society automatically take the white woman side and this results a lot of innocent black men in jail because of the stigma that all black people are dangerous. Remember that next time you think false rape accusations aren’t a big deal. 

I’m looking at you white feminists. 

The legal system usually takes the womans side. Theres been a shit ton of times when there was someone who was obviously innocent being sent to prison based soley on someones word.

Glad to see my old blog posts are still going around.

(via dontneedfeminism)

April162014
imminentdeathsyndrome:

In April last year, Kent’s Kirsty Sowden - a former John Lewis shop assistant - was jailed for just 14 months after crying rape over a fully consensual encounter with a man she’d met online. He was arrested at his workplace in front of colleagues and detained in a cell, wasting 376 hours of police time and costing £14,000.
In May 2012, 20 year-old Hanna Byron was spared jail after falsely accusing her ex-boyfriend of rape in revenge for breaking up with her.
In August, Sheffield’s Emma Saxon was jailed for making a second false rape allegation against her boyfriend, Martin Blood. He was held in police custody for 14 hours and subjected to an intrusive medical examination - all because he’d stood her up. 
Meanwhile, Teesside’s Joanne Buckley was jailed for three years in September after stabbing a man because he refused to have sex with her - then threatening to cry rape if he went to hospital for treatment.
These cases - and the many, many more like them - are exactly why men deserve protecting by the law as much as women. 
Tellingly, my opinion is shared by the majority of Britain. In 2010, a poll conducted by MailOnline showed that 67 per cent of readers want pre-conviction anonymity for rape defendants, as opposed to 33 per cent who don’t.
Originally, the law agreed. In 1976, the Labour government introduced rape trial anonymity for both the alleged victim and the accused. It operated this way until 1988, when guidelines were relaxed to help police investigations. 
At the time, the media was far less powerful, less global, less permanent than it is today. There was no internet, no slew of gossip magazines, no mobile phones with cameras, no social networking sites. 
Police techniques and technology were also less refined, so a lack of anonymity helped them.
Now, things are different. Dramatically so. And - once again - the law should change to reflect this. 
Why? Because a not guilty verdict is no longer enough to repair the planet-sized crater of damage caused by weeks of daily headlines across the globe.
Perhaps more importantly, it’s also a human right to be innocent until proven guilty.
Feminists like Julie Bindel disagree. She seems to believes that men deserve the stain of rape stigma, guilty or not, simply because they are male. In fact, she once said being falsely accused wasn’t so bad. ‘A fair number of celebrities have been accused of rape in the past and do not seem to have suffered longer term,’ she incredulously wrote in The Guardian. ‘To say that an accusation ruins lives is perhaps a sweeping generalisation.’
Perhaps she should speak to Peter Bacon. In 2009, he was cleared by a jury in just 40 minutes after being falsely accused of rape by a woman he met through a one-night stand. Although he was totally exonerated, the incident was so traumatic that he changed his name and left the country. His life was utterly destroyed. 
Meanwhile, the accuser kept her anonymity - and, for all we know, went on to accuse others. Where’s the fairness in that?
Click here for the full story

imminentdeathsyndrome:

In April last year, Kent’s Kirsty Sowden - a former John Lewis shop assistant - was jailed for just 14 months after crying rape over a fully consensual encounter with a man she’d met online. He was arrested at his workplace in front of colleagues and detained in a cell, wasting 376 hours of police time and costing £14,000.

In May 2012, 20 year-old Hanna Byron was spared jail after falsely accusing her ex-boyfriend of rape in revenge for breaking up with her.

In August, Sheffield’s Emma Saxon was jailed for making a second false rape allegation against her boyfriend, Martin Blood. He was held in police custody for 14 hours and subjected to an intrusive medical examination - all because he’d stood her up. 

Meanwhile, Teesside’s Joanne Buckley was jailed for three years in September after stabbing a man because he refused to have sex with her - then threatening to cry rape if he went to hospital for treatment.

These cases - and the many, many more like them - are exactly why men deserve protecting by the law as much as women. 

Tellingly, my opinion is shared by the majority of Britain. In 2010, a poll conducted by MailOnline showed that 67 per cent of readers want pre-conviction anonymity for rape defendants, as opposed to 33 per cent who don’t.

Originally, the law agreed. In 1976, the Labour government introduced rape trial anonymity for both the alleged victim and the accused. It operated this way until 1988, when guidelines were relaxed to help police investigations. 

At the time, the media was far less powerful, less global, less permanent than it is today. There was no internet, no slew of gossip magazines, no mobile phones with cameras, no social networking sites. 

Police techniques and technology were also less refined, so a lack of anonymity helped them.

Now, things are different. Dramatically so. And - once again - the law should change to reflect this. 

Why? Because a not guilty verdict is no longer enough to repair the planet-sized crater of damage caused by weeks of daily headlines across the globe.

Perhaps more importantly, it’s also a human right to be innocent until proven guilty.

Feminists like Julie Bindel disagree. She seems to believes that men deserve the stain of rape stigma, guilty or not, simply because they are male. In fact, she once said being falsely accused wasn’t so bad. ‘A fair number of celebrities have been accused of rape in the past and do not seem to have suffered longer term,’ she incredulously wrote in The Guardian. ‘To say that an accusation ruins lives is perhaps a sweeping generalisation.’

Perhaps she should speak to Peter Bacon. In 2009, he was cleared by a jury in just 40 minutes after being falsely accused of rape by a woman he met through a one-night stand. Although he was totally exonerated, the incident was so traumatic that he changed his name and left the country. His life was utterly destroyed. 

Meanwhile, the accuser kept her anonymity - and, for all we know, went on to accuse others. Where’s the fairness in that?

Click here for the full story

(via aintnotomomigirllivinheresowhat)

12AM
April142014

dontneedfeminism:

imminentdeathsyndrome:

poppypicklesticks:

This may be one of the most disgusting things feminists have done so far: they start off with saying MOST DOMESTIC VIOLENCE DEATHS ARE ALL MENS FAULT…. and rig a vending machine so they can steal peoples money to make some point about domestic violence

Donate to a domestic violence shelter?  Volunteer at one?  Nah, why do that when some middle class wimmin’s studies majors can whore out human suffering of others to get free stuff for themselves?  Because expressing frustration at losing some money means you will beat someone to death.  If you’re a man of course, women never get annoyed at frustrating over minor things ever.  

“Every seventh murder on our planet occurs within families. And in most cases it’s all men’s fault.“ [Citation Needed]

This is the stupidest shit I’ve ever seen.

6AM
April122014
sprech4:

damegi:

makubenoaijin:

foreveralonefedoras:

heanbean:

oh my god I was waiting for a bus and there were these two fedora wearing clones stood nearby and I thought ‘wow they exist in real life’ and then twO MORE GOT OFF A BUS AND JOINED THEM AND THEY ALL LOOK EXACTLY THE SAME AND I JUST DON’T UNDERSTAND

It’s like the matrix glitched.

i can’t stop laughing

i’m 98% sure these are young orthodox jews you FUCKING JACKASSES

These aren’t fedoras, they’re hats used by Yeshivish and Hasidic Jews because their faith requires them to keep their heads covered. Also, you can see the Payot (sidelocks) on the older ones growing in. ALSO, two of them have the same pamphlet, they probably just got out of school or a service. A L S O you can even see the Tallit hanging out from under their clothes.
Next time please try rubbing two brain cells together long enough to consider a situation that isn’t “haHA they’re WEArinG HATs that KINDA VAGUELY LOOK like a fedora this is COMEDY GOLD”

sprech4:

damegi:

makubenoaijin:

foreveralonefedoras:

heanbean:

oh my god I was waiting for a bus and there were these two fedora wearing clones stood nearby and I thought ‘wow they exist in real life’ and then twO MORE GOT OFF A BUS AND JOINED THEM AND THEY ALL LOOK EXACTLY THE SAME AND I JUST DON’T UNDERSTAND

It’s like the matrix glitched.

i can’t stop laughing

i’m 98% sure these are young orthodox jews you FUCKING JACKASSES

These aren’t fedoras, they’re hats used by Yeshivish and Hasidic Jews because their faith requires them to keep their heads covered. Also, you can see the Payot (sidelocks) on the older ones growing in. ALSO, two of them have the same pamphlet, they probably just got out of school or a service. A L S O you can even see the Tallit hanging out from under their clothes.

Next time please try rubbing two brain cells together long enough to consider a situation that isn’t “haHA they’re WEArinG HATs that KINDA VAGUELY LOOK like a fedora this is COMEDY GOLD

(via machoppichu)

4PM
3PM
the-unpopular-opinions:

I find it funny that a lot of the people on this website that say things like “cis scum” and “cishet” disparagingly and unironically were probably born to cisgendered heterosexual parents (doesn’t count if they were disowned obviously, but still). Bonus points if said cisgendered heterosexual parents bought them the computer that they’re using to bitch on tumblr.

the-unpopular-opinions:

I find it funny that a lot of the people on this website that say things like “cis scum” and “cishet” disparagingly and unironically were probably born to cisgendered heterosexual parents (doesn’t count if they were disowned obviously, but still). Bonus points if said cisgendered heterosexual parents bought them the computer that they’re using to bitch on tumblr.

(via myreasonswhyihatetmblralot)

3PM
← Older entries Page 1 of 349